|
|
发表于 2023-11-5 08:55:58
|
显示全部楼层
|
Architecture follows the prosperity of the people. Can poor people live in architecturally attractive houses? I believe that is possible. These are simple houses that look nice and can be designed creatively. High-quality, innovative architecture, on the other hand, costs more money. The tenants have to pay that in the end. There is still a way to increase the quality without increasing the price. More competition among providers. Competition increases quality and lowers prices. So you shouldn't necessarily help construction companies to make greater profits, but rather enable more competition in the construction industry and the architectural scene. The same principle in all other aspects increases the prosperity of people and thus the environment, which includes architecture, becomes increasingly beautiful and meets the needs of customers. As some have already said. Repainting facades doesn't help. If a pair of underwear has a hole, the hole remains, regardless of whether the underwear is black or brown. What I found interesting: The creator of the thread is of the opinion that external air conditioning systems, i.e. installed on building facades, improve the appearance. I don't know. In the rest of the world things are seen very differently. And this idea also seems very strange to me, that air conditioning systems should look nice on the walls of houses...because they obscure the view of the architecture that you are supposed to admire. The air conditioning units on the house walls belong away. Modern houses now regulate the climate differently than through external air conditioning systems on the house walls. |
|
[复制链接]
IP卡
狗仔卡
显身卡